Lexhub, Author at Lexhub

Bombay High Court Quashes ₹100 Crore PMLA Freeze: Section 8(2) Finding Cannot Be Supplied by Appellate Tribunal

Introduction The Bombay High Court has delivered an important judgment concerning the statutory safeguards governing attachment and freezing…

Lexhub September 10, 2026

Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court: Section 148 NI Act Amount Must Be Refunded After Acquittal

Introduction The Delhi High Court has held that a complainant cannot retain an amount released to him under…

Lexhub September 10, 2026

Supreme Court Judgements

Khanindra Kr. Dutta v. CBI: Can Section 13(1)(d) Conviction Stand Without Pecuniary Advantage?

Introduction The Supreme Court of India has acquitted Khanindra Kr. Dutta in a corruption case arising from alleged…

Lexhub September 9, 2026

Allahabad High Court

Mere Ownership of Premises Does Not Establish Criminal Negligence Under Section 106 BNS

Case Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 28250 of 2026Saurabh Srivastava, J.High Court of Judicature at AllahabadDecision dated: September…

Lexhub September 9, 2026

Supreme Court Judgements

Supreme Court on Quo Warranto and Forged PhD Degree

Introduction Can a person’s appointment to a public office be challenged through a writ of quo warranto merely…

Lexhub September 9, 2026

Uncategorized

Delhi APP Syllabus 2026: Delhi Government Lawyer syllabus: Delhi APO Exam: Delhi APP Exam: UPSC APO Exam

Delhi APP Syllabus 2026 Overview The Delhi APP Syllabus 2026 is designed to assess a candidate's legal acumen,…

Lexhub September 8, 2026

Bombay High Court

“TIP Identified Him—But Supreme Court Still Acquitted Him. Why?”

Introduction The Supreme Court has acquitted Dhanraj in Dhanraj v. State of Rajasthan, Criminal Appeal No. 135 of…

Lexhub September 8, 2026

Supreme Court Judgements

Dhanraj v. State of Rajasthan: Supreme Court Acquits Accused Over Fatal Identification and Medical Evidence Gaps

Introduction The Supreme Court of India has set aside the conviction of Dhanraj in a POCSO case arising…

Lexhub September 8, 2026

Allahabad High Court

Allahabad High Court: Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC When It Discloses a Cause of Action

Brief Facts of the Case The dispute concerned a shop situated at Bazaar Nadrai Gate, Kasganj, owned by…

Lexhub September 8, 2026

Tripura High Tripura High Court

Tripura High Court Holds Divorcee Daughter Cannot Be Denied Family Pension Merely Because Divorce Occurred After Father’s Death

Introduction The High Court of Tripura has clarified an important question concerning family pension payable to a divorced…

Lexhub September 8, 2026

Bombay High Court Quashes ₹100 Crore PMLA Freeze: Section 8(2) Finding Cannot Be Supplied by Appellate Tribunal

Delhi High Court: Section 148 NI Act Amount Must Be Refunded After Acquittal

Khanindra Kr. Dutta v. CBI: Can Section 13(1)(d) Conviction Stand Without Pecuniary Advantage?

Mere Ownership of Premises Does Not Establish Criminal Negligence Under Section 106 BNS

Supreme Court on Quo Warranto and Forged PhD Degree

Delhi APP Syllabus 2026: Delhi Government Lawyer syllabus: Delhi APO Exam: Delhi APP Exam: UPSC APO Exam

“TIP Identified Him—But Supreme Court Still Acquitted Him. Why?”

Dhanraj v. State of Rajasthan: Supreme Court Acquits Accused Over Fatal Identification and Medical Evidence Gaps

Allahabad High Court: Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC When It Discloses a Cause of Action

Tripura High Court Holds Divorcee Daughter Cannot Be Denied Family Pension Merely Because Divorce Occurred After Father’s Death

Get Latest Updates

Prepare Judiciary, UPSC, Legal Officers, APO and other Government Exams